• ISSN 1000-0615
  • CN 31-1283/S
DUAN Shenghua, LIU Zhenming, HU Honghui, LIU Xiaojun, BAI Zhiyi, WANG Guiling, LI Jiale. Growth traits of pearl mussels and pearl formation percentage and size of non-nucleated pearl after graft operation[J]. Journal of fisheries of china, 2020, 44(10): 1645-1653. DOI: 10.11964/jfc.20190911977
Citation: DUAN Shenghua, LIU Zhenming, HU Honghui, LIU Xiaojun, BAI Zhiyi, WANG Guiling, LI Jiale. Growth traits of pearl mussels and pearl formation percentage and size of non-nucleated pearl after graft operation[J]. Journal of fisheries of china, 2020, 44(10): 1645-1653. DOI: 10.11964/jfc.20190911977

Growth traits of pearl mussels and pearl formation percentage and size of non-nucleated pearl after graft operation

Funds: National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672654, 31772835); National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0901400)
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    WANG Guiling. E-mail: glwang@shou.edu.cn

  • Received Date: September 19, 2019
  • Revised Date: December 30, 2019
  • Available Online: April 10, 2020
  • Published Date: September 30, 2020
  • In order to screen out the high-quality combination of donor and host mussels, explore the difference and correlation in the growth traits of different pearl mussels after graft operation, compare the difference of the pearl-forming percentage and size in each combination, by using Hyriopsis cumingii (S), H. schlegelii (C) and Cristaria plicata (Z) as donor and host mussels respectively, 9 pearl mussels combinations were obtained. In addition, 3 species pearl mussels without graft operation were taken as control groups. 9 combinations and 3 control groups were compared by measuring the growth traits (body weight, shell length, shell height and shell width) one year after grafting, and at the same time the correlation of growth traits of each combination was analyzed. The number and size of non-nucleated pearl in each combination were measured, the pearl formation percentage and roundness were calculated and the difference among different combinations was analyzed. The results showed that the non-nucleated graft operation affects the growth performance of pearl mussels. The growth traits were better than corresponding values of control group when H. cumingii and H. schlegelii were host mussels. The growth traits of S-S group was biggest when H. cumingii were host mussels. The growth traits of S-C and C-C groups were biggest when H. schlegelii was host mussels. However, the growth of C. plicata groups was ess than the control group; except for the C-C group , the correlation coefficient between shell length and body weight was the highest compared to correlation coefficient of other growth traits in each group. The correlation coefficient between shell width and body weight of C-C group was the largest; the combinations between H. cumingii and H. schlegelii (S-S, C-S, S-C and C-C groups)had higher pearl formation percentage, the same with Z-Z group (91.67%-100%). S-S, S-C and C-C groups were rounder in shape but the pearl size was medium. The results showed that the non-nucleated graft operation affects the growth performance of pearl mussels and the growth performance of various combinations is different. The growth performance and pearl formation percentage of S-S, S-C, C-C groups were better but the pearl size was medium. The results provided an important basis for exploring the differences and correlation between the growth traits of different pearl mussels and the comparison of the pearl-forming rate and size of the non-nucleated pearls produced.
  • [1]
    汪桂玲, 白志毅, 刘晓军, 等. 三角帆蚌种质资源研究进展[J]. 水产学报, 2014, 38(9): 1618-1627.

    Wang G L, Bai Z Y, Liu X J, et al. Research progress on germplasm resources of Hyriopsis cumingii[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2014, 38(9): 1618-1627(in Chinese).
    [2]
    徐毛喜, 邱齐骏, 孙小兵, 等. 池蝶蚌(Hyriopsis schlegelii)与三角帆蚌(Hyriopsis.cumingii)育珠生产对比研究[J]. 江西水产, 2005(4): 27-29.

    Xu M X, Qiu Q J, Sun X B, et al. Comparative research of pearl performance between Hyriopsis schlegelii and Hyriopsis cumingii[J]. Jiangxi Fishery Science and Technology, 2005(4): 27-29(in Chinese).
    [3]
    白志毅, 汪桂玲, 刘晓军, 等. 中国淡水珍珠种业现状与发展趋势[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2014, 23(6): 874-881.

    Bai Z Y, Wang G L, Liu X J, et al. The status and development trend of freshwater pearl seed industry in China[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2014, 23(6): 874-881(in Chinese).
    [4]
    何毛贤, 史兼华, 林岳光, 等. 马氏珠母贝生长性状的相关分析[J]. 海洋科学, 2006, 30(11): 1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3096.2006.11.001

    He M X, Shi J H, Lin Y G, et al. The growth trait correlated responses in pearl oyster Pinctada martensii[J]. Marine Sciences, 2006, 30(11): 1-4(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3096.2006.11.001
    [5]
    黄锋绍. 马氏珠母贝不同插核、收珠时期育珠母贝和珍珠表型性状关系的研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2013.

    Huang F S. The research of the relationship between different insert nucleus and harvest pearl time of Pinctada fucata martensii (Dunker) and different phenotypic character of pearl[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2013(in Chinese).
    [6]
    尹立鹏, 邓岳文, 杜晓东, 等. 贝龄对马氏珠母贝植核贝生长、成活率和育珠性状的影响[J]. 中国水产科学, 2012, 19(4): 715-720.

    Yin L P, Deng Y W, Deng X D, et al. Effects of age on growth, survival and pearl production and traits in pearl oyster Pinctada martensii[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2012, 19(4): 715-720(in Chinese).
    [7]
    Ky C L, Blay C, Sham-Koua M, et al. Indirect improvement of pearl grade and shape in farmed Pinctada margaritifera by donor “oyster” selection for green pearls[J]. Aquaculture, 2014, 432: 154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.05.002
    [8]
    谢楠, 李应森, 郑汉丰, 等. 三角帆蚌、池蝶蚌及杂交F1代养殖效果与育珠性能的比较[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 2006, 15(3): 264-269.

    Xie N, Li Y S, Zheng H F, et al. Comparison of culture and pearl performances among Hyriopsis schlegelii, Hyriopsis cumingii and their reciprocal hybrids[J]. Journal of Shanghai Fisheries University, 2006, 15(3): 264-269(in Chinese).
    [9]
    Blay C, Sham-Koua M, Vonau V, et al. Influence of nacre deposition rate on cultured pearl grade and colour in the black-lipped pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera using farmed donor families[J]. Aquaculture International, 2014, 22(2): 937-953. doi: 10.1007/s10499-013-9719-5
    [10]
    Kishore P, Southgate P C. The effect of different culture methods on the quality of round pearls produced by the black-lip pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758)[J]. Aquaculture, 2016, 451: 65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.08.031
    [11]
    白志毅, 李家乐, 汪桂玲. 三角帆蚌产珠性能与生长性状和插片部位的关系[J]. 中国水产科学, 2008, 15(3): 493-499. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2008.03.017

    Bai Z Y, Li J L, Wang G L. Relationship between pearl production, growth traits and the inserted position of mantle piece in triangle mussel (Hyriopsis cumingii)[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2008, 15(3): 493-499(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2008.03.017
    [12]
    王爱民, 石耀华, 周志刚. 马氏珠母贝不同地理种群内自繁和种群间杂交子一代形态性状参数及相关性分析[J]. 海洋水产研究, 2004, 25(3): 39-45.

    Wang A M, Shi Y H, Zhou Z G. Morphological trait parameters and their correlations of the first generation from matings and crosses of geographical populations of Pinctada martensii (Dunker)[J]. Marine Fisheries Research, 2004, 25(3): 39-45(in Chinese).
    [13]
    Deng Y W, Du X D, Wang Q H, et al. Correlation and path analysis for growth traits in F1 population of pearl oyster Pinctada martensii[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2008, 10(2): 68-73.
    [14]
    李清清, 白志毅, 刘晓军, 等. 三角帆蚌生长性状和内壳色与所产无核珍珠质量的相关性分析[J]. 水产学报, 2015, 39(11): 1631-1639.

    Li Q Q, Bai Z Y, Liu X J, et al. Correlation analysis of non-nucleated pearl quality parameters with growth traits and inner shell color of Hyriopsis cumingii[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2015, 39(11): 1631-1639(in Chinese).
    [15]
    李希. 池蝶蚌(Hyriopsis schlegelii)家系生长与育珠性状分析[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2012.

    Li X. Families growth of Hyriopsis schlegelii and traits analysis about pearling groups[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2012(in Chinese).
    [16]
    邓陈茂, 梁飞龙, 符韶, 等. 马氏珠母贝术前处理与育珠研究[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2010(4): 124-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6482.2010.04.018

    Deng C M, Liang F L, Fu S, et al. Study on pre-operation condition and pearl production of Pinctada martensii[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2010(4): 124-128(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6482.2010.04.018
    [17]
    梁飞龙, 王钦贵, 邓岳文, 等. 珠核规格、植核位置和贝龄对大珠母贝植核育珠的影响[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2015, 35(4): 51-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2015.04.008

    Liang F L, Wang Q G, Deng Y W, et al. Effects of nucleus size, nucleus implantation location and age on round nucleated pearl production of Pinctada maxima[J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2015, 35(4): 51-56(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2015.04.008
    [18]
    杨品红, 王志陶, 于杨, 等. 育珠对三角帆蚌形态学影响的初步研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(35): 20103-20104, 20127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.35.087

    Yang P H, Wang Z T, Yu Y, et al. Preliminary analysis on the morphology of Hyriopsis cumingi afffected by pearl-breed[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(35): 20103-20104, 20127(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.35.087
    [19]
    郑侠飞, 王小后, 苏林可, 等. 插片育珠对三角帆蚌耗氧率的影响[J]. 淡水渔业, 2013, 43(6): 93-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2013.06.018

    Zheng X F, Wang X H, Su L K, et al. Effects of graft operation on oxygen consumption rate of Hyriopsis cummingii[J]. Freshwater Fisheries, 2013, 43(6): 93-96(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2013.06.018
    [20]
    吴雷明, 白志毅, 刘晓军, 等. 珍珠蚌5个群体不同阶段生长性能及外部形态变异分析[J]. 淡水渔业, 2017, 47(4): 75-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2017.04.013

    Wu L M, Bai Z Y, Liu X J, et al. Comparative analysis of growth trait and morphological difference among five freshwater pearl mussel populations[J]. Freshwater Fisheries, 2017, 47(4): 75-82(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2017.04.013
    [21]
    张根芳, 张文府, 罗雨, 等. 1龄三角帆蚌壳形态性状对体质量的通径分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2018, 33(6): 755-759.

    Zhang G F, Zhang W F, Luo Y, et al. Path analysis of morphometrical traits on body weight of one-year old freshwater mussel Hyriopsis cumingii[J]. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2018, 33(6): 755-759(in Chinese).
    [22]
    徐毛喜. 池蝶蚌生物学特性及育珠性能研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2008.

    Xu M X. The research on biological characteristics and pearl performance of Hyriopsis schlegelii[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008(in Chinese).
    [23]
    王钦贵, 谢绍河, 梁飞龙, 等. 褶纹冠蚌研究概况[J]. 水产养殖, 2016, 37(7): 51-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2016.07.010

    Wang Q G, Xie S H, Liang F L, et al. Progress on the culture of pearl mussel Cristaria plicata[J]. Journal of Aquaculture, 2016, 37(7): 51-54(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2016.07.010
    [24]
    郭奕惠, 刘宝锁, 范嗣刚, 等. 合浦珠母贝选育组和对照组生长性状相关分析[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2017, 26(2): 212-220. doi: 10.12024/jsou.20160401750

    Guo Y H, Liu B S, Fan S G, et al. Correlation analysis of growth traits among selective and control groups of pearl oyster Pinctada martensii[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2017, 26(2): 212-220(in Chinese). doi: 10.12024/jsou.20160401750
    [25]
    王庆恒, 逯云召, 邓岳文, 等. 马氏珠母贝生长性状与珍珠质量和珍珠层厚度的相关分析[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2013, 33(3): 18-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2013.03.003

    Wang Q H, Lu Y Z, Deng Y W, et al. Correlation analysis on pearl thickness, weight and morphology of Pinctada martensii[J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2013, 33(3): 18-21(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9159.2013.03.003
    [26]
    闻海波, 顾若波, 曹哲明, 等. 3个地理种群三角帆蚌育珠相关性状比较及壳重的通径分析[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2012, 21(2): 161-166.

    Wen H B, Gu R B, Cao Z M, et al. Comparison of morphological traits related to pearl performance in Hyriopsis cumingii from three geographical populations and path analysis on shell weight[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2012, 21(2): 161-166(in Chinese).
    [27]
    吴雷明. 珍珠蚌种质与所产无核珍珠颜色及大小相关性初步研究[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2016.

    Wu L M. A preliminary study of the correlation between pearl mussel strain and non-nucleated pearl color and size[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2016(in Chinese).
    [28]
    徐在宽, 徐大中, 武擎. 小片与蚌间的关系对珍珠质量的影响[J]. 水产养殖, 1992(02): 16-18.

    Xu Z K, Xu D Z, Wu Q.The relationship between the supplier and the accepter of the mantle and its effect on pearl quality[J]. Journal of Aquaculture 1992(02): 16-18(in Chinese).
    [29]
    陈伟耀. 马氏珠母贝育珠和生长性状与相关基因的关联分析[D]. 湛江: 广东海洋大学, 2014.

    Chen W Y. Correlation analysis of pearl production and growth traits with the related genes from Pinctada martensii[J]. Zhanjiang: Guangdong Ocean University, 2014(in Chinese).
    [30]
    Tayale A, Gueguen Y, Treguier C, et al. Evidence of donor effect on cultured pearl quality from a duplicated grafting experiment on Pinctada margaritifera using wild donors[J]. Aquatic Living Resources, 2012, 25(3): 269-280. doi: 10.1051/alr/2012034
    [31]
    刘越. 三角帆蚌供片蚌对珍珠质量的影响[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2013.

    Liu Y. The effect of donor Hyriopsis cumingii on the quality of pearls[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2013(in Chinese).

Catalog

    Article views (2324) PDF downloads (39) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return