罗氏沼虾育种核心群体遗传背景与生长性状的基因组评估

Genomic evaluation of genetic background and growth traits in a nucleus population of Macrobrachium rosenbergii

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究一步法基因组最佳线性无偏预测(ssGBLUP)与最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)方法在单性状与两性状模型下,对罗氏沼虾(Macrobrachium rosenbergii)体重和体长遗传参数估计与育种值预测准确性的影响,为罗氏沼虾育种实践提供理论依据。
    方法 以选育5代的罗氏沼虾核心群体为研究对象,利用G04和G05两代共316个分型个体的278 469个SNP位点进行遗传背景分析。结合两代分型个体的SNP数据和G05代4 771尾个体的生长性状测试数据,基于ssGBLUP和BLUP方法,分别构建单性状和两性状模型,估计体重和体长的遗传参数并评估育种值预测准确性。
    结果 两代群体有效群体大小分别为138和124,遗传背景高度一致,但均存在一定近交(基因组近交系数0.074~0.096)。同胞鉴定结果与两代系谱不一致率为10.44%。两种模型下,ssGBLUP和BLUP方法估计的体重遗传力(0.194±0.086~0.203±0.090 vs. 0.161±0.079~0.172±0.083)与体长遗传力(0.195±0.091~0.206±0.091 vs. 0.159±0.081~0.169±0.083)均无显著差异。体重和体长间的遗传相关极强(r > 0.98)。两性状模型的育种值预测准确性(体重:0.762~0.769;体长:0.760~0.769)显著高于单性状模型(体重:0.463~0.466;体长:0.459~0.464),但ssGBLUP与BLUP方法间准确性差异不显著。
    结论 相比单性状模型,两性状模型能显著提升生长性状育种值预测准确性,表明利用性状间信息共享可有效提升选种效率;而ssGBLUP因分型个体缺乏表型、样本量有限,未显著提高预测准确性。因此,建议当前育种优先采用多性状模型,未来需重点扩大兼具基因型与表型的群体规模,以充分发挥基因组选择的潜力。

     

    Abstract:
    The giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) is an economically important farmed species in China, and the genetic improvement of its growth traits is of great significance for enhancing industrial profitability.
    Objective This study aimed to investigate the effects of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) under single-trait and two-trait models on the estimation of genetic parameters and the accuracy of breeding value prediction for body weight and body length in Macrobrachium rosenbergii, thereby providing a theoretical basis for breeding practices.
    Method The nucleus population of M. rosenbergii after five generations of selection was used as the research subject. A genetic background analysis was conducted using 278 469 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci from 316 genotyped individuals across two generations (G04 and G05). Combining the SNP data of genotyped individuals from both generations with the phenotypic records of growth traits from 4 771 individuals in the G05 generation, single-trait and two-trait models were constructed based on ssGBLUP and BLUP methods, respectively. Genetic parameters for body weight and body length were estimated, and the accuracy of breeding value prediction was evaluated.
    Result The effective population sizes for the two generations were 138 and 124, respectively, with highly consistent genetic backgrounds, although a certain degree of inbreeding was observed in both generations (genomic inbreeding coefficients ranging from 0.074 to 0.096). The inconsistency rate between sibship identification and the two-generation pedigree was 10.44%. Under both models, the heritability estimates for body weight (0.194±0.086–0.203±0.090 vs. 0.161±0.079–0.172±0.083) and body length (0.195±0.091–0.206±0.091 vs. 0.159±0.081–0.169±0.083) obtained by ssGBLUP and BLUP did not differ significantly. The genetic correlation between body weight and body length was extremely strong (> 0.98). The accuracy of breeding value prediction under the two-trait model (body weight: 0.762–0.769; body length: 0.760–0.769) was significantly higher than that under the single-trait model (body weight: 0.463–0.466; body length: 0.459–0.464), whereas no significant difference in accuracy was detected between the ssGBLUP and BLUP methods.
    Conclusion Compared with the single-trait model, the two-trait model significantly improved the accuracy of breeding value prediction for growth traits, indicating that utilizing information sharing between traits can effectively enhance selection efficiency. However, ssGBLUP did not significantly improve prediction accuracy, likely due to the lack of phenotypic records for genotyped individuals and the limited sample size. Therefore, it is recommended that multi-trait models be prioritized in current breeding programs, and future efforts should focus on expanding the population size with both genotypes and phenotypes to fully realize the potential of genomic selection.

     

/

返回文章
返回